Recent Posts
How to Prepare for Your First Support Coordination Meeting
NDIS hospital discharge support coordination
How to Spot When You’re Underspending (and What to Do About It)
Understanding NDIS Impairment Categories and Funding Updates: What It Means for Your Plan
What Is Occupational Therapy and How Can It Help?
Your Supported Living - Update from Minister on NDIS in Future
Brief Timeline — NDIS “Reset” Announcement
22 April 2026
Health and NDIS Minister Mark Butler announces a major “reset” of the NDIS at the National Press Club, outlining the intent to refocus the Scheme, slow cost growth, strengthen integrity, and ensure long‑term sustainability.
Late April 2026
Public & Sector Briefings
The government clarifies that reforms will be phased, with most changes not immediate and current participants remaining on existing plans unless notified.
12–14 May 2026
Budget & Legislation Introduced
NDIS Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future Generations) Bill to be introduced during Federal Budget sittings, focused on financial controls and integrity measures.
By 30 June 2026 (target)
Initial Legislative Changes
The government aims to pass early legislative changes by the end of June, subject to parliamentary process.
From 2026 onward
Phased Implementation & Co‑Design
Consultation and design work commences on structural reforms, with major eligibility and planning changes expected to apply primarily to new entrants from 2027–2028.
What Changes Now vs What Changes Later
Why the Phased Approach
Stabilise costs and integrity quickly, while allowing more complex access and planning reforms to be co‑designed and implemented safely.
Change Pathway
🟢 NOW (2026)
Immediate controls & safeguards
🟡 NEXT (2027)
System transition & readiness
🔵 LATER (2027–2028)
Structural reform fully applied
What Changes NOW (2026)
🟢 Immediate actions
- Initial NDIS Amendment legislation introduced and passed
- Tighter rules for unscheduled plan reassessments
- Expanded provider registration for higher‑risk supports
- Stronger fraud, compliance and enforcement powers
- Early reset of fast‑growing plan areas (e.g. social and community participation)
- No blanket changes to current participant plans unless formally notified
What Changes LATER (Phased from 2027–2028)
🔵 Structural reforms
- Eligibility based on functional capacity, not diagnosis lists
- Major access changes apply primarily to new entrants
- Gradual transition for existing participants over time
- New planning and budgeting framework for consistency
- Increased use of commissioned / panel‑based service models
- Clearer boundaries between the NDIS and mainstream / foundational supports
Comment on Hon Mark Butler’s – National Press Club Address on the NDIS
Opening Context
The Minister used the National Press Club address this week to outline the Australian Government’s approach to the National Disability Insurance Scheme, alongside broader commentary on aged care and social policy.
While the need for sustainability was emphasised, the address raised serious questions about transparency, consultation, and the future direction of the NDIS.
Key Observations
1. Strong Focus on Cost Control and Fraud
The Minister repeatedly highlighted fraud, rorting, and provider misconduct as key drivers of NDIS cost pressures which is not in fact the source of the billions of dollars of overspend and cost increase
However, there was limited acknowledgment of well-documented systemic and design failures within the NDIS planning and administration processes, which is widely evidenced broadly to be the main contributing factor to the budget increase
2. Silence on the Disability Royal Commission
There was no reference to the Disability Royal Commission or how its findings are informing current reforms.
This omission is concerning given the Commission’s clear recommendations on safeguards, participant rights, and system accountability which would address causes for budget increases
3. Increased Reassessments and Reduced Rights
The Minister confirmed plans to restrict the right to unscheduled reassessments, with around one in five participant plans reviewed annually.
At the same time, proposals to limit unscheduled reassessments risk restricting participants’ ability and right to challenge incorrect or inadequate plans, with the poor and often grossly lacking planning due diligence sited as a leading cause of budget issues with the agency’s own CEO previously stating their planners are not reading reports and documents submitted.
The Minister said that unscheduled reassessments benefit plan managers not participants because it often resulted in an increase in funding for the participant. This was an alarming statement made by the Minister and it was unclear if he was suggesting plan managers as a whole were behaving poorly who do not typically submit these requests for reassessment. This was either a mis-worded statement or demonstrated a lack of basic knowledge of process.
4. Community Participation Funding to Be Capped
The Minister flagged constraints on social and community participation funding, potentially moving away from needs based planning toward capped or target-based models mentioned that an average of $30 000 per participant would be capped, mentioned targets of $16 000 in previous years would be looked at
This raises concerns about reduced choice, control, and social inclusion for people with disability.
While a cap and standardisation of funding was announced there was then further comment that funding and support would be based on functional assessment and need versus standardised lists and diagnosis.
Children, Assessments, and “Thriving Kids”
5. New Assessment Tools Replacing Clinical Evidence
- The proposed “Thriving Kids” initiative includes the development of a standardised functional assessment tool.
- There is currently no clarity on why established, clinically validated functional assessments are considered insufficient, or how the new tool will be evidence-based.
6. Lack of Detail and Limited Transparency
- Key initiatives, including “Thriving Kids” and “Foundational Supports,” were discussed in principle but without operational detail.
- Families and service providers remain unclear about eligibility, access pathways, and implementation timelines.
Safeguards, Planning, and Accountability
7. No Commitment to Restore Safeguards
The address did not include plans to restore safeguards removed since the introduction of the NDIS, such as:
- Case management
- Face-to-face planning
- Stronger checks and balances in decision-making
- Community visitors and statutory checks to at least pre-NDIS levels
- Removal of safeguards that correspond directly with increased fraud and budget blow outs
8. Essential Supports Narrowly Defined
- The Minister described a renewed focus on “essential supports,” framed around basic care needs.
- This signals a potential shift away from the NDIS’s original goals of independence, participation, and community inclusion.
Choice, Control, and Consultation
9. Tension Between Rhetoric and Reality
- While affirming support for “nothing about us without us,” the reforms outlined were not presented as co-designed with people with disability.
- Measures limiting flexibility, reassessment rights, and funding discretion appear inconsistent with the promise of choice and control.
10. State-Level Concerns
- Queensland has not provided the final sign off and agreed to participate in the “Thriving Kids” initiative.
- This highlights ongoing intergovernmental and implementation challenges.
What Changes NOW (2026)
- Sustainability of the NDIS is important, but it must not come at the cost of fairness, dignity, and participant rights.
- Any reform must address system design, planning quality, and accountability — not place responsibility primarily on participants or frontline providers.
- People with disability expect genuine consultation, transparency, and evidence-based policy, not reforms developed without them.
- Mr Butler confirmed every participant would be reassessed. Previous reassessment of children was done without notice by some parents reporting they were given 30 days to produce evidence and assessment reports when the public health system takes far longer than 30 days to secure appointments or get reports produced, creating chaos and widespread panic.
- Suggesting the cost blowout has anything to do with too many unregistered providers is like a husband trying to convince their wife the reason they spend too much on fishing gear is because there are too many good fishing shops. It will never pass the pub test. The government is risking insulting the intelligence of all Australians and losing confidence
Mr River Night
Founder and Director
National Disability Sector Advocate,
PWD, Carer and Father
‘Let’s bring the human back to Community Services’
Developing Australian Communities Pty Ltd
ABN 68 646 184 947
Share this entry